Midazolam and pethidine versus propofol and fentanyl patient controlled sedation/analgesia for upper gastrointestinal tract ultrasound endoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial
- 30 November 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Digestive and Liver Disease
- Vol. 39 (11), 1024-1029
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2007.08.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endoscopist administered propofol for upper-GI EUS is safe and effective: a prospective study in 500 patientsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2004
- Target-controlled propofol infusion during monitored anesthesia in patients undergoing ERCPGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2004
- Patient-Controlled Sedation for Colonoscopy: a Randomized Trial Comparing Patient-Controlled Administration of Propofol and Alfentanil with Physician-Administered Midazolam and PethidineEndoscopy, 2003
- Safer colonoscopy with patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with propofol and alfentanilGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2001
- Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopyThe American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2000
- Performance, patient acceptance, appropriateness of indications and potential influence on outcome of EUS: a prospective study in 397 consecutive patientsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999
- A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating the cost-effectiveness of droperidol as a sedative premedication for EUSGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999
- TCI compared with manually controlled infusion of propofol: a multicentre studyAnaesthesia, 1998
- Intra‐operative patient‐controlled sedation and patient attitude to controlAnaesthesia, 1994
- The ASA Classification of Physical Status–A RecapitulationAnesthesiology, 1978