Selection of lineup foils in operational contexts
- 21 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Applied Cognitive Psychology
- Vol. 22 (2), 159-169
- https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1366
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do strict rules and moving images increase the reliability of sequential identification procedures?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2006
- Life of the mind: The interface of psychopharmaceuticals, domestic economies, and social abandonmentAmerican Ethnologist, 2004
- A memory and decision model for eyewitness identificationApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2003
- Are police video identifications fair to African–Caribbean suspects?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2003
- Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence–accuracy correlation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996
- Default values in eyewitness descriptions: A problem for the match-to-description lineup foil selection strategy.Law and Human Behavior, 1994
- Selection of lineup foils by similarity to the suspect is likely to misfire.Law and Human Behavior, 1992
- Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991
- Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineups.Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications.Psychological Bulletin, 1980