A Cross-Sector Comparison of Motivation-Related Concepts in For-Profit and Not-For-Profit Service Organizations
- 7 August 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
- Vol. 40 (2), 296-317
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009342897
Abstract
This contribution examines differences in four motivation-related concepts between employees in not-for-profit and for-profit sector service organizations. Using regression analyses, 630 knowledge workers, employed in either the not-for-profit or the for-profit sector, were compared. The majority of the hypotheses were supported by the data. Even after the impact of gender, age, seniority, contract type, and task characteristics were controlled for, employees from both sectors differed significantly. Not-for-profit workers valued more social service, perceived a better person—organization fit, and were more motivated by identified and integrated regulation. Their for-profit counterparts valued more advancement and were more motivated by external regulation. These conclusions account for a broad range of activities within the service industry because a wide variety of organizations were included in the study.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relational Job Design and the Motivation to Make a Prosocial DifferenceAcademy of Management Review, 2007
- Work environment and workforce problems: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of hospital nurses in BelgiumInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2006
- How are employees of the nonprofit sector motivated? A research needNonprofit Management and Leadership, 2005
- Doing one's duty: chronological age, felt autonomy, and subjective well‐beingEuropean Journal of Personality, 2004
- Basic Individual Values, Work Values, and the Meaning of WorkApplied Psychology, 1999
- Personality traits discriminating between employees in public- and in private-sector organizationsThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1999
- Person–Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational EntryOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Teachers’ job characteristics and motivationEducational Research, 1994
- The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personalityJournal of Research in Personality, 1985
- Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job RedesignAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1979