Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 6 October 2015
- journal article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 314 (13), 1356-1363
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.12009
Abstract
Surgical removal remains the primary treatment for rectal cancer. Results have improved substantially during the past 4 decades, largely owing to adherence to the principles of total mesorectal excision.1 Removing all of the mesorectum containing the lymph nodes and tumor is paramount for a good outcome and minimal recurrence within the pelvis.2 Involvement of the circumferential resection margin (CRM) or distal resection margin and the quality of total mesorectal excision are related to local recurrence and long-term survival.3Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Long-Term Outcomes of the Australasian Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Conventional Open Surgical Treatments for Colon CancerAnnals of Surgery, 2012
- Faculty Opinions recommendation of Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.Published by H1 Connect ,2008
- What Is the Role for the Circumferential Margin in the Modern Treatment of Rectal Cancer?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL AFTER TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL CANCERThe Lancet, 1986