Race, ethnicity and lung function: A brief history
Open Access
- 1 January 2015
- journal article
- Vol. 51 (4), 99-101
Abstract
Spirometry is the most common lung function test and represents the cornerstone diagnostic and management tool for individuals with chronic respiratory diseases. Variability and changing temporal trends in lung function measurements, however, have contributed to the problem of standardizing spirometry, especially with regard to ‘race correction’. This article examines the history of the practice, the dilemmas encountered by researchers and the implications of adhering to long-held beliefs without considering more complex explanatory frameworks.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding Socioeconomic and Racial Differences in Adult Lung FunctionAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- Canadian Thoracic Society Pulmonary Function Standards Committee.Canadian Respiratory Journal, 2011
- “Race Correction” in Pulmonary-Function TestingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Genetic Ancestry in Lung-Function PredictionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Interpretative strategies for lung function testsEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2005
- History counts: a comparative analysis of racial/color categorization in US and Brazilian censusesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2000
- Spirometric Reference Values from a Sample of the General U.S. PopulationAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1999
- ‘Ethnic discounting’ and spirometryRespiratory Medicine, 1995
- Review and analysis of variation between spirometric values reported in 29 studies of healthy African adults.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994
- Ethnic Differences in Lung Function: evidence for proportional differencesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1974