Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones
- 1 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in HPB
- Vol. 14 (4), 254-259
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00439.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoendoscopic Rendezvous Versus Preoperative ERCP and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for the Management of Cholecysto-CholedocholithiasisAnnals of Surgery, 2012
- Cost-Effective Treatment of Patients with Symptomatic Cholelithiasis and Possible Common Bile Duct StonesJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2011
- Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Prior to Laparoscopic CholecystectomyArchives of Surgery, 2011
- A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stonesSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Prospective Randomized Trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for Common Bile Duct Stone DiseaseArchives of Surgery, 2010
- A Randomized, Clinical Trial to Compare Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Subsequent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Primary Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration During Cholecystectomy in Higher Risk Patients with CholedocholithiasisJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2009
- Hospital cost categories of one-stage versus two-stage management of common bile duct stonesSurgical Endoscopy, 2009
- Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study.2002
- The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2001