Empirical Legal Scholarship in Law Reviews
- 1 December 2010
- journal article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Law and Social Science
- Vol. 6 (1), 581-599
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102209-152848
Abstract
Despite persistent calls for more empirical legal scholarship, only recently have scholars provided evidence that empirical legal scholarship has indeed entered the mainstream of the legal academy. Defining empirical scholarship as the systematic organization of a series of observations with the method of data collection and analysis made available to the audience, we analyzed the content of 60 law review volumes published in the years 1998 and 2008. Our content analysis revealed that by 2008 nearly half of law review articles included some empirical content. Production of original research is less common. The highest-ranked law reviews published more articles and included more complex research designs. Analyzing the benefits and costs of publishing in law reviews, we predict that law reviews will see more original empirical scholarship in the future, despite the increased availability of peer-reviewed publication outlets.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empirical Legal Studies Before 1940: A Bibliographic EssayJournal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2009
- Eminent Domain and the Psychology of Property Rights: Proposed Use, Subjective Attachment, and Taker IdentityJournal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2008
- Treaties' End: The Past, Present, and Future of International Lawmaking in the United StatesThe Yale Law Journal, 2008
- Rational Choice and Developmental Influences on Recidivism Among Adolescent Felony OffendersJournal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2007
- Semiotic AnthropologyAnnual Review of Anthropology, 2007
- The Flight from Arbitration: An Empirical Study of Ex Ante Arbitration Clauses in Publicly-Held Companies' ContractsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
- Building the Bridge from Both Sides of the River: Law and Society and Rational ChoiceLaw & Society Review, 2004
- Minding the Law: How Courts Rely on Storytelling, and How Their Stories Change the Way We Understand the Law—and Ourselves. Anthony G. Amsterdam and Jerome Bruner. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000. Pp. x+453. $35.00.American Journal of Sociology, 2001
- Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law of TortsThe Yale Law Journal, 1961
- The Problem of Social CostThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1960