The Democratic Ethos and Public Management
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Administration & Society
- Vol. 34 (2), 229-250
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399702034002005
Abstract
One of the few issues on which public management scholars agree in theory is the centrality of the democratic ethos. Public policy has recently paid attention to more democratic forms of policy making (e.g., participatory policy analysis), and public administration has periodically studied and advocated increased citizen participation in the processes of government. But the field of public management scholarship has yet to make a similar commitment to the democratic ethos, despite some contemporary practices (flattened hierarchies, self-managing teams) that represent democratization in public organizations. This essay reviews reasons why public management should be more democratic, some ways in which it is not, and proposes some ways in which the focus of scholarship and practice should be directed.This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Administering in the Public Interest: The Facilitative Role for Public AdministratorsPublished by SAGE Publications ,2012
- The Political Theory of ReinventionPublic Administration Review, 2000
- What Right Do Public Managers Have to Lead?Public Administration Review, 1998
- Accountability In A ‘Reinvented’ GovernmentPublic Administration, 1998
- Ethics and EntrepreneurshipPolicy Studies Journal, 1996
- The Big Questions of Public ManagementPublic Administration Review, 1995
- Reconciling Public Entrepreneurship and DemocracyPublic Administration Review, 1992
- The Democratization of the Policy SciencesPublic Administration Review, 1992
- Citizens Panels: A New Approach to Citizen ParticipationPublic Administration Review, 1986
- Why Policy Analysis and Ethics Are IncompatibleJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1984