How planners deal with uncomfortable knowledge: The dubious ethics of the American Planning Association
- 30 June 2013
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Cities
- Vol. 32, 157-163
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.016
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Other Versions
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Mass Media Matter to Planning ResearchJournal of Planning Education and Research, 2012
- Uncomfortable knowledge: the social construction of ignorance in science and environmental policy discoursesEconomy and Society, 2012
- How (In)accurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects?: The Case of TransportationJournal of the American Planning Association, 2005
- Response to RemingtonJournal of the American Planning Association, 2003
- Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects:Error or Lie?Journal of the American Planning Association, 2002
- Planning and Social Control: Exploring the Dark SideJournal of Planning Literature, 1998
- A Desire Named Streetcar Fantasy and Fact in Rail Transit PlanningJournal of the American Planning Association, 1992
- Deception in Dallas: Strategic Misrepresentation in Rail Transit Promotion and EvaluationJournal of the American Planning Association, 1990
- Ethics and Advocacy in Forecasting for Public PolicyBusiness and Professional Ethics Journal, 1990