Quality Assessment in Surgery
- 1 April 2010
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 251 (4), 766-771
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181d0d211
Abstract
Recording of outcome by surgical residents is unreliable,despite active and focused training. Hence, surgery should be evaluated by dedicated personnelKeywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data as a Catalyst for Quality ImprovementJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2007
- Toward optimal recording of surgical complications: Concurrent tracking compared to the discharge data setSurgery, 2007
- Comparing performance of Morbidity and Mortality Conference and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for detection of complications after urologic surgeryUrology, 2006
- Racial Disparity in Surgical Complications in New York StateAnnals of Surgery, 2005
- Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical LiteratureAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the department of veterans affairs national surgical quality improvement programJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002
- The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse eventsHealth Technology Assessment, 2001
- Randomized prospective trial of pylorus-preserving vs. classic duodenopancreatectomy (whipple procedure): initial clinical resultsJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2000
- Improving survival in gastric cancer: Review of operative mortality in english language publications from 1970British Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Survival After PancreatoduodenectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1990