Are Two-dimensional CT Measurements of Small Noncalcified Pulmonary Nodules Reliable?
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 231 (2), 453-458
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2312030167
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing intrarater, interrater and test–retest reliability of continuous measurementsStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Screening for Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Spiral Computed TomographyAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Lung Nodule Enhancement at CT: Multicenter StudyRadiology, 2000
- Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screeningThe Lancet, 1999
- Measuring agreement in method comparison studiesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1999
- FDG Imaging of Lung Nodules: A Phantom Study Comparing SPECT, Camera-based PET, and Dedicated PETRadiology, 1999
- Diagnostic accuracy and safety of CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy of the lung: comparison of small and large pulmonary nodules.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- Cancer statistics, 1993CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1993
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Asymptomatic solitary pulmonary nodulesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1973