On imagining what is true (and what is false)
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Thinking & Reasoning
- Vol. 9 (1), 1-42
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780244000097
Abstract
How do people imagine the possibilities in which an assertion would be true and the possibilities in which it would be false? We argue that the mental representation of the meanings of connectives, such as “and”, “or”, and “if”, specify how to construct the true possibilities for simple assertions containing just a single connective. It follows that the false possibilities are constructed by inference from the true possibilities. We report converging evidence supporting this account from four experiments in which the participants had to list the true and the false possibilities for various sorts of assertion. Their systematic errors, response times, and think-aloud protocols corroborated the theory's predictions. Not even true possibilities are immediately available for complex assertions containing two or more different connectives. The task of listing the true possibilities then becomes difficult, and the task of listing the false possibilities almost impossible.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference.Psychological Review, 2002
- Mental models and deductionTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2001
- Illusions in Reasoning About ConsistencyScience, 2000
- Illusions in modal reasoningMemory & Cognition, 2000
- Strategies in Syllogistic ReasoningCognitive Science, 1999
- Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning.Psychological Review, 1999
- The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection taskCognition, 1989
- Pragmatic reasoning schemasCognitive Psychology, 1985
- On the process of comparing sentences against picturesCognitive Psychology, 1972
- How we think.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1910