LyralR is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Dermatology
- Vol. 141 (6), 1076-1083
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.03208.x
Abstract
Contact allergy to fragrances is a common problem world‐wide. The currently used fragrance mix (FM) for patch testing has only eight constituents and does not identify all fragrance‐allergic patients. As perfumes may contain 100 or more substances, the search for markers for allergy continues. The synthetic fragrance 4‐(4‐hydroxy‐4‐methylpentyl)‐3‐cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral®) was tested together with the FM and 11 other fragrance substances on consecutive patients in six European departments of dermatology. All patients were carefully questioned regarding a history of reactions to scented products in the past and were grouped into four categories: ‘certain’, ‘probable’, ‘questionable’ and ‘none’. Lyral® (5% in petrolatum) gave a positive reaction in 2·7% of 1855 patients (range 1·2–17%) and ranked next to 11·3% with FM allergy. Twenty‐four patients reacted to both Lyral® and FM, but 21 (1·1%) reacted positively only to Lyral®. Of 124 patients with a ‘certain’ history, 53·2% reacted to the FM and a further 7·2% to Lyral® only. If any kind of history of fragrance intolerance was given, 80% (40 of 50) of Lyral® positive patients had a ‘positive’ history while only 58·6% (123 of 210) of FM positive patients had such a history; this difference was significant at P < 0·01. Lyral® was identified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry in some products which had caused an allergic contact dermatitis in four typical patients who showed a patch test positive to Lyral® and negative or doubtful to FM. In conclusion, we recommend the testing of 5% Lyral® (in petrolatum) in patients suspected of contact dermatitis.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Allergens in combination have a synergistic effect on the elicitation response: a study of fragrance-sensitized individualsBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1998
- Adverse reactions to fragrancesContact Dermatitis, 1997
- Contact allergy to popular perfumes; assessed by patch test, use test and chemical analysisBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1996
- Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumesContact Dermatitis, 1995
- Analysis of fragrances in cosmetics by gas chromatography–mass spectrometryJournal of High Resolution Chromatography, 1995
- Allergic contact dermatitis from the synthetic fragrances Lyral and acetyl cedrene in separate underarm deodorant preparationsContact Dermatitis, 1994
- Frequency of false‐negative reactions to the fragrance mixContact Dermatitis, 1993
- Contact allergy to cosmetics: causative ingredientsContact Dermatitis, 1987
- Safety Evaluation of Perfumed Shampoos: Dose/Response Relationships for Product use Testing by Presensitized SubjectsJournal of Toxicology- Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology, 1984
- Perfume dermatitis. a study of 20 patientsArchives of Dermatology, 1977