How do doctors explain randomised clinical trials to their patients?
- 31 August 1999
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in European Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 35 (8), 1187-1193
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00116-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Teaching senior oncologists communication skills: results from phase I of a comprehensive longitudinal program in the United Kingdom.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Clinicians' attitudes to clinical trials of cancer therapyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1997
- The benefits of participation in clinical trialsEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1996
- Patients' consent should have been soughtBMJ, 1996
- Is informed consent essential for all chemotherapy studies?European Journal of Cancer, 1994
- Barriers to clinical trials: Part II: Knowledge and attitudes of potential participantsCancer, 1994
- Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel.BMJ, 1993
- Redressing the balance - The ethics of not entering an eligible patient on a randomised clinical trialAnnals of Oncology, 1992
- Patients' willingness to enter clinical trials: Measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participationSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- Randomised comparison of procedures for obtaining informed consent in clinical trials of treatment for cancer.BMJ, 1986