Complete Lives in the Balance
- 7 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in American Journal of Bioethics
- Vol. 10 (4), 37-45
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160903581718
Abstract
The allocation of scarce health care resources such as flu treatment or organs for transplant presents stark problems of distributive justice. Persad, Wertheimer, and Emanuel have recently proposed a novel system for such allocation. Their “complete lives system” incorporates several principles, including ones that prescribe saving the most lives, preserving the most life-years, and giving priority to persons between 15 and 40 years old. This paper argues that the system lacks adequate moral foundations. Persad and colleagues' defense of giving priority to those between 15 and 40 leaves them open to the charge that they discriminate unfairly against children. Second, the paper contends that the complete lives system fails to provide meaningful practical guidance in central cases, since it contains no method for balancing its principles when they conflict. Finally, the paper proposes a new method for balancing principles of saving the most lives and maximizing life-years.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethical criteria for allocating health-care resources.The Lancet, 2009
- Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventionsThe Lancet, 2009
- AGE-WEIGHTINGEconomics and Philosophy, 2008
- Measuring people's preferences regarding ageism in health: some methodological issues and some fresh evidenceSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2003
- Cost-Value Analysis in Health CarePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1999
- Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmesHealth Economics, 1999
- Age-based rationing and womenJAMA, 1991