Comparison of the toxicity profile of PD‐1 versus PD‐L1 inhibitors in non–small cell lung cancer: A systematic analysis of the literature
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 28 September 2017
- Vol. 124 (2), 271-277
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31043
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) are effective therapies in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein, the authors performed a systematic review investigating differences in the toxicities of PD‐1 and PD‐L1 inhibitors. METHODS An electronic literature search was performed of public databases (MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica dataBASE [EMBASE], and Cochrane) and conference proceedings for trials using PD‐1 inhibitors (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and PD‐L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) in patients with NSCLC. A formal systematic analysis was conducted with Comprehensive Meta‐Analysis software (version 2.2). Clinical and demographic characteristics, response, and toxicity data were compared between both groups. RESULTS A total of 23 studies reported between 2013 and 2016 were eligible for analysis. The total number of patients evaluated for toxicities was 3284 patients in the PD‐1 group and 2460 patients in the PD‐L1 group. The baseline patient characteristics of the 2 groups were similar, although there was a trend toward increased squamous histology in the group treated with PD‐L1 (32% vs 25%; P = .6). There was no difference in response rate noted between PD‐1 (19%) and PD‐L1 (18.6%) inhibitors (P = .17). The incidence of overall adverse events (AEs) was comparable between the PD‐1 and PD‐L1 inhibitors (64% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 63%‐66%] vs 66% [95% CI, 65%‐69%]; P = .8). Fatigue was the most frequently reported AE with both classes of drugs. Patients treated with PD‐1 inhibitors were found to have a slightly increased rate of immune‐related AEs (16% [95% CI, 14%‐17%] vs 11% [95% CI, 10%‐13%]; P = .07) and pneumonitis (4% [95% CI, 3%‐5%] vs 2% [95% CI, 1%‐3%]; P = .01) compared with patients who received PD‐L1 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS In this systematic review involving 5744 patients with NSCLC, the toxicity and efficacy profiles of PD‐1 and PD‐L1 inhibitors appear to be similar. Cancer 2018;124:271‐7. © 2017 American Cancer Society.Keywords
Funding Information
- Winship Cancer Institute (P30CA138292, U10CA180864)
- National Cancer Institute
- National Institutes of Health
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Characteristics of Lung Cancers Detected by Computer Tomography Screening in the Randomized NELSON TrialAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2013
- Safety, Activity, and Immune Correlates of Anti–PD-1 Antibody in CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic ScreeningThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Characteristics and Predictors of Missed Opportunities in Lung Cancer Diagnosis: An Electronic Health Record–Based StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Reduction of Elevated Plasma Osteopontin Levels With Resection of Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Connective Tissue-Activating Peptide III: A Novel Blood Biomarker for Early Lung Cancer DetectionJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Plasma DNA Quantification in Lung Cancer Computed Tomography ScreeningAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2009
- Occurrence of Autoantibodies to Annexin I, 14-3-3 Theta and LAMR1 in Prediagnostic Lung Cancer SeraJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- The Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS)American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Errors in Cancer Diagnosis: Current Understanding and Future DirectionsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007