Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 14 March 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Biotechnology for Biofuels
- Vol. 10 (1), 64
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7
Abstract
The introduction of renewable jet fuel (RJF) is considered an important emission mitigation measure for the aviation industry. This study compares the well-to-wake (WtWa) greenhouse gas (GHG) emission performance of multiple RJF conversion pathways and explores the impact of different co-product allocation methods. The insights obtained in this study are of particular importance if RJF is included as an emission mitigation instrument in the global Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). Fischer–Tropsch pathways yield the highest GHG emission reduction compared to fossil jet fuel (86–104%) of the pathways in scope, followed by Hydrothermal Liquefaction (77–80%) and sugarcane- (71–75%) and corn stover-based Alcohol-to-Jet (60–75%). Feedstock cultivation, hydrogen and conversion inputs were shown to be major contributors to the overall WtWa GHG emission performance. The choice of allocation method mainly affects pathways yielding high shares of co-products or producing co-products which effectively displace carbon intensive products (e.g., electricity). Renewable jet fuel can contribute to significant reduction of aviation-related GHG emissions, provided the right feedstock and conversion technology are used. The GHG emission performance of RJF may be further improved by using sustainable hydrogen sources or applying carbon capture and storage. Based on the character and impact of different co-product allocation methods, we recommend using energy and economic allocation (for non-energy co-products) at a global level, as it leverages the universal character of energy allocation while adequately valuing non-energy co-products.Keywords
Funding Information
- Climate-KIC (APSP0002)
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparing life cycle assessments of different biofuel optionsCurrent Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2013
- Biofuel greenhouse gas calculations under the European Renewable Energy Directive – A comparison of the BioGrace tool vs. the tool of the Roundtable on Sustainable BiofuelsApplied Energy, 2013
- Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanolBiotechnology for Biofuels, 2013
- Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. contextEnergy Policy, 2011
- Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debtClimatic Change, 2011
- How can land-use modelling tools inform bioenergy policies?Interface Focus, 2011
- Large-scale utilization of biomass energy and carbon dioxide capture and storage in the transport and electricity sectors under stringent CO2 concentration limit scenariosInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010
- Applying life-cycle assessment to low carbon fuel standards—How allocation choices influence carbon intensity for renewable transportation fuelsEnergy Policy, 2010
- Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendationsResources, Conservation and Recycling, 2009
- Fischer–Tropsch diesel production in a well-to-wheel perspective: A carbon, energy flow and cost analysisEnergy Conversion and Management, 2009