Operationalising unscheduled care policy: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals’ perspectives
Open Access
- 1 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of General Practitioners in British Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 63 (608), e192-e199
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X664243
Abstract
Background UK health policy aims to reduce the use of unscheduled care, by increasing proactive and preventative management of patients with long-term conditions in primary care. Aim The study explored healthcare professionals’ understanding of why patients with long-term conditions use unscheduled care, and the healthcare professionals’ understanding of their role in relation to reducing the use of unscheduled care. Design and setting Qualitative study interviewing different types of healthcare professionals providing primary care or unscheduled care services in northwest England. Method Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 healthcare professionals (six GPs; five out-of-hours GPs; four emergency department doctors; two practice nurses; three specialist nurses; two district nurses; seven active case managers). Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results Healthcare professionals viewed the use of unscheduled care as a necessary component of care for patients with long-term conditions. Those whose roles involved working to targets to reduce the use of unscheduled care described a tension between this and delivering optimum patient care. Three approaches to reducing unscheduled care were described: optimising the system; negotiating the system; and optimising the patient. Conclusion Current policy to reduce the use of unscheduled care does not take account of the perceptions of the healthcare professionals who are expected to implement them. Lipsky’s theory of street-level bureaucrats provides a framework to understand how healthcare professionals respond to imposed policies. Healthcare professionals did not see the use of unscheduled care as a problem and there was limited commitment to the policy targets. Therefore, policy should aim for whole-system change rather than reliance on individual healthcare professionals to make changes in their practice.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Qualitative data analysis for applied policy researchPublished by Informa UK Limited ,2010
- With an attack I associate it more with going into hospital: Understandings of asthma and psychosocial stressors; are they related to use of services?Social Science & Medicine (1982), 2008
- Exploring the effect of changes to service provision on the use of unscheduled care in England: population surveysBMC Health Services Research, 2007
- Rising to the challenge: will the NHS support people with long term conditions?BMJ, 2005
- National Service Frameworks and UK general practitioners: street‐level bureaucrats at work?Sociology of Health & Illness, 2004
- A new role for the general practitioner? Reframing 'inappropriate attenders' to inappropriate servicesPrimary Health Care Research & Development, 2004
- Influences on hospital admission for asthma in south Asian and white adults: qualitative interview studyBMJ, 2001
- Whither the Almshouse? Overutilization and the Role of the Emergency DepartmentJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1998
- Qualitative research and psychological theorizingBritish Journal Of Psychology, 1992
- Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public ServicesMichigan Law Review, 1981