A Single Surgeon??s 12-Year Experience with Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: Part II. An Analysis of Long-Term Complications, Aesthetic Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 118 (4), 832-839
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000232397.14818.0e
Abstract
Few reports have critically evaluated long-term outcomes following two-stage implant reconstruction. The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term aesthetic results, late complications, and patient satisfaction following tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. A single surgeon's extensive experience with implant-based reconstruction provides an opportunity to evaluate these results in a uniformly treated patient population. A total of 1522 tissue expander/implant reconstructions were initiated in 1221 patients from July of 1992 to June of 2004. Data on a cohort of 315 patients (410 reconstructions) with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up were entered into a prospectively maintained outcomes database. Overall aesthetic grade, capsular contracture grade, patient satisfaction, and late complications were prospectively evaluated, and outcome data were recorded on an ongoing basis. Mean follow-up was 36.7 months. Eighty-eight percent of patients had a good to excellent aesthetic result. Laterality of reconstruction (bilateral versus unilateral) and radiation history were significant predictors of overall cosmesis. Aesthetic results were not related to preoperative breast size, implant volume, or body mass index. Pathologic capsular contractures (grade III/IV) developed in 10.4 percent of patients. Four percent of all permanent implants were exchanged for a second prosthesis. Ninety-five percent of patients were satisfied with their reconstruction. Tissue expander/implant reconstruction yields good to excellent long-term aesthetic results in the majority of patients, and overall patient satisfaction remains high. Bilateral reconstructions have higher overall aesthetic grades. Reconstruction may be performed in patients with larger-volume breasts with satisfactory cosmesis. Successful outcomes are possible in patients who receive chest wall irradiation.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Two-Year Results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome StudyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2002
- Prospective Evaluation of Late Cosmetic Results following Breast Reconstruction: I. Implant ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2001
- Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2001
- Radiation Therapy after Immediate Breast Reconstruction with ImplantsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2000
- Staged Breast Reconstruction with Saline-Filled Implants in the Irradiated Breast: Recent Trends and Therapeutic ImplicationsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2000
- IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION IN TWO STAGES USING ANATOMICAL TISSUE EXPANSIONScandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 2000
- Aesthetic Results and Patient Satisfaction with Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Tissue Expansion: A Follow-Up StudyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1997
- Reconstruction and the Radiated BreastPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1995
- Classification of Capsular Contracture after Prosthetic Breast ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1995
- A Comparison of Outcomes Using Three Different Methods of Breast ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1992