A systematic review finds methodological improvements necessary for prognostic models in determining traumatic brain injury outcomes
- 30 April 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 61 (4), 331-343
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.06.011
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivationNature Genetics, 2008
- Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and Validation of a Prognostic Score Based on Admission CharacteristicsJournal of Neurotrauma, 2005
- Classification and Regression Tree for Prediction of Outcome after Severe Head Injury Using Simple Clinical and Laboratory VariablesJournal of Neurotrauma, 2004
- Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patientsJournal of Neurosurgery, 2003
- Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regressionJournal of Neurosurgery, 2002
- Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data setsStatistics in Medicine, 2000
- Severe head injuries: An outcome prediction and survival analysisIntensive Care Medicine, 1996
- Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic predictionStatistics in Medicine, 1984
- Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injuryJournal of Neurosurgery, 1981
- PREDICTING OUTCOME IN INDIVIDUAL PATIENTS AFTER SEVERE HEAD INJURYThe Lancet, 1976