Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 6 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 17 (5), 1729
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729
Abstract
Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the epidemic. The aim of this study was to survey the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. The data will be used for future reference. Methods: From 31 January to 2 February 2020, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The online survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms in the past 14 days, contact history with COVID-19, knowledge and concerns about COVID-19, precautionary measures against COVID-19, and additional information required with respect to COVID-19. Psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: This study included 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China. In total, 53.8% of respondents rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe; 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 28.8% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 8.1% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Most respondents spent 20–24 h per day at home (84.7%); were worried about their family members contracting COVID-19 (75.2%); and were satisfied with the amount of health information available (75.1%). Female gender, student status, specific physical symptoms (e.g., myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Specific up-to-date and accurate health information (e.g., treatment, local outbreak situation) and particular precautionary measures (e.g., hand hygiene, wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact of the outbreak and lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and about one-third reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychosocial effects of an Ebola outbreak at individual, community and international levelsBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2016
- Methodology of development and students' perceptions of a psychiatry educational smartphone applicationTechnology and Health Care, 2014
- Methodology of developing a smartphone application for crisis research and its clinical applicationTechnology and Health Care, 2014
- Usage of Social Media and Smartphone Application in Assessment of Physical and Psychological Well-Being of Individuals in Times of a Major Air Pollution CrisisJMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2014
- Impact of 2013 south Asian haze crisis: study of physical and psychological symptoms and perceived dangerousness of pollution levelBMC Psychiatry, 2014
- The impact of communications about swine flu (influenza A H1N1v) on public responses to the outbreak: results from 36 national telephone surveys in the UK.Health Technology Assessment, 2010
- Psychosocial and coping responses within the community health care setting towards a national outbreak of an infectious diseaseJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 2010
- The 1995 Kikwit Ebola outbreak: lessons hospitals and physicians can apply to future viral epidemicsGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 2008
- SARS Control and Psychological Effects of Quarantine, Toronto, CanadaEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2004
- The impact of community psychological responses on outbreak control for severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong KongJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2003