Civil society, political stability, and state power in Central Asia: cooperation and contestation
- 5 October 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Democratization
- Vol. 17 (5), 795-825
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2010.501172
Abstract
This article develops a concept of civil society in Central Asia distinct from that which emerged from the East European communist societies of the late 1980s. Kazakhstan presents a case study of a civil society that conceptually can be located between the vibrant civil society of the Baltic democracies and the civil society of the strongly repressive environments of Belarus or Uzbekistan. Kazakhstan's authoritarian structures and cultural traditions make it difficult to develop strong independent civic organizations – cooperation tends to mark state-civil society relations more than contestation, which shaped much of Eastern Europe's experience. Even in a context of relative affluence where civil society organizations are allowed some space to engage in critical activities, contestation tends to be minimized. This is only partially related to state suppression and cooptation; a political culture that views democratic processes as potentially destabilizing is also a significant factor. Kazakhstan represents a distinct Central Asian model of civil society, comparable to Russia but qualitatively different from that found in either Eastern or Western Europe, where civil society is less willing to confront the state, more cooperative with the authoritarian system, and wary of the potential for civic activism to degenerate into instability. Differentiating types of civil society is important because a key component of Western democracy assistance programmes has been providing assistance to build and strengthen civil societies. By refining our understanding of distinct civil society patterns in Central Asia, we can enhance our knowledge of political processes in this critical region, and we may improve the effectiveness of democracy assistance programmes. The study is grounded in field research, interviews, civil society workshops, survey research, and government documents.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Handbook of National LegislaturesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2009
- Crude DemocracyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2008
- Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central AsiaPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2006
- Developing CulturesPublished by Taylor & Francis Ltd ,2006
- Countering Islamic Radicalism in Central AsiаConnections: The Quarterly Journal, 2006
- Economic Dimensions of Security in Central AsiaPublished by Rand Corporation ,2006
- Exploring Civil SocietyPublished by Taylor & Francis Ltd ,2004
- Modernization, Cultural Change, and DemocracyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2001
- Democracy in AmericaPublished by University of Chicago Press ,2000
- Modernization and PostmodernizationPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1997