Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review
Open Access
- 3 August 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Implementation Science
- Vol. 6 (1), 1-16
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-92
Abstract
Background: The use of computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) may improve chronic disease management, which requires recurrent visits to multiple health professionals, ongoing disease and treatment monitoring, and patient behavior modification. The objective of this review was to determine if CCDSSs improve the processes of chronic care (such as diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of disease) and associated patient outcomes (such as effects on biomarkers and clinical exacerbations). Methods: We conducted a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid's EBM Reviews database, Inspec, and reference lists for potentially eligible articles published up to January 2010. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the use of CCDSSs to usual practice or non-CCDSS controls. Trials were eligible if at least one component of the CCDSS was designed to support chronic disease management. We considered studies 'positive' if they showed a statistically significant improvement in at least 50% of relevant outcomes. Results: Of 55 included trials, 87% (n = 48) measured system impact on the process of care and 52% (n = 25) of those demonstrated statistically significant improvements. Sixty-five percent (36/55) of trials measured impact on, typically, non-major (surrogate) patient outcomes, and 31% (n = 11) of those demonstrated benefits. Factors of interest to decision makers, such as cost, user satisfaction, system interface and feature sets, unique design and deployment characteristics, and effects on user workflow were rarely investigated or reported. Conclusions: A small majority (just over half) of CCDSSs improved care processes in chronic disease management and some improved patient health. Policy makers, healthcare administrators, and practitioners should be aware that the evidence of CCDSS effectiveness is limited, especially with respect to the small number and size of studies measuring patient outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findingsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: Methods of a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic reviewImplementation Science, 2010
- The Vermont Diabetes Information System: A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Population Based Decision Support SystemJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2009
- Clinical Decision Support Capabilities of Commercially-available Clinical Information SystemsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2009
- Do computerised clinical decision support systems for prescribing change practice? A systematic review of the literature (1990-2007)BMC Health Services Research, 2009
- Implementing a palm pilot intervention for primary care providers: Lessons learnedContemporary Clinical Trials, 2009
- Impact of a Multifaceted Intervention on Cholesterol Management in Primary Care PracticesArchives of Internal Medicine, 2009
- Impact of Computerized Decision Support on Blood Pressure Management and Control: A Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Intensive treatment with methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: aiming for remission. Computer Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAMERA, an open-label strategy trial)Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2007
- Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient OutcomesJAMA, 2005