Comparison of Defects in ProFile and ProTaper Systems after Clinical Use
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Endodontics
- Vol. 32 (1), 61-65
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.017
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Influence of a Manual Glide Path on the Separation Rate of NiTi Rotary InstrumentsJournal of Endodontics, 2005
- SEM Observations of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Endodontic Instruments that Fractured During Clinical UseJournal of Endodontics, 2005
- Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systemsOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2004
- Factors Influencing Defects of Rotary Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments After Clinical UseJournal of Endodontics, 2004
- K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile Systems: Breakage and Distortion in Severely Curved Roots of MolarsJournal of Endodontics, 2004
- Scanning Electron Microscope Observations of New and Used Nickel-Titanium Rotary FilesJournal of Endodontics, 2003
- A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canalsOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2001
- Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instrumentsJournal of Endodontics, 1997
- A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instrumentsJournal of Endodontics, 1995
- An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of nitinol root canal filesJournal of Endodontics, 1988