Tracking Public Mood in the Supreme Court: Cross-Time Analyses of Criminal Procedure and Civil Rights Cases
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Research Quarterly
- Vol. 48 (1), 61-78
- https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299504800104
Abstract
Representational models of judicial decision making posit that the Supreme Court is a permeable institution, subject to external pressures-namely elite and mass opinion. Court rulings, therefore, should be demonstrably congruent with the views of the majoritarian electoral/political alliance. Building upon an innovative study by Mishler and Sheehan (1993), the relationship between public and elite attitudes and Supreme Court rulings are examined in two important issue areas: criminal procedure and race- related civil rights. The results indicate that permeability of the Court varies to some degree according to issue area. While public opinion (in the pre- Reagan years) has a direct affect on Supreme Court liberalism in both issue areas, the direct impact of elite opinion is evidenced only in the area of criminal procedure, not in the area of race-related civil rights. The relation ship between public opinion and Court liberalism during the Reagan years, however, is negative as the gap between liberalism in the public "mood" and in Court decisions has widened. These nuances in the relationship between the Supreme Court and the broader sociopolitical environment indicate that the Court does follow changes in the dominant political alliance more readily in some issue areas than it does in others.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme CourtAmerican Political Science Review, 1988
- Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme CourtAmerican Political Science Review, 1988
- The Supreme Court and Sex Discrimination: the Role of the Solicitor GeneralThe Western Political Quarterly, 1988
- Amicus Curiae Briefs By the Solicitor General During the Warren and Burger Courts: a Research NoteThe Western Political Quarterly, 1988
- SUPPORT FOR THE SUPREME COURT AS A NATIONAL POLICYMAKERLaw & Policy, 1983
- Public Support for the Supreme Court in the 1970sAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1982
- Environmental Constraints on the Behavior of Judges: A Representational Model of Judicial Decision MakingLaw & Society Review, 1980
- Public Opinion and Federal Judicial PolicyAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1977
- The Supreme Court and Critical ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1975
- Intervention Analysis with Applications to Economic and Environmental ProblemsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1975