Test accuracy and potential sources of bias in diagnostic test evaluation
- 3 November 2019
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by AMPCo in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 212 (1), 10-+
- https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50449
Abstract
Click on the article title to read more.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1104136, 1163054)
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Core Competencies in Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals Consensus Statement Based on a Systematic Review and Delphi SurveyJAMA Network Open, 2018
- STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studiesBMJ, 2015
- Screening patients with a family history of subarachnoid haemorrhage for intracranial aneurysms: screening uptake, patient characteristics and outcomeJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2011
- Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test AccuracyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2008
- Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathwaysBMJ, 2006
- Detection and Characterization of Intracranial Aneurysms with MR Angiography: Comparison of Volume-Rendering and Maximum-Intensity-Projection AlgorithmsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2003
- Slopes of a Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve and Likelihood Ratios for a Diagnostic TestAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1998
- Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic TestsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1994
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982