Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews
- 1 May 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 66 (5), 474-482
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.001
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient-expert partnerships in research: how to stimulate inclusion of patient perspectivesHealth Expectations, 2010
- Setting Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Case Study Using Primary Open-Angle GlaucomaOphthalmology, 2010
- Prioritizing research: Patients, carers, and clinicians working together to identify and prioritize important clinical uncertainties in urinary incontinenceNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2010
- Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority settingBMC Health Services Research, 2009
- Systematic reviews and knowledge translationBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2006
- Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-makingJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Global priority setting for Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health researchJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2005
- A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Health Care InstitutionsHealth Care Analysis, 2003
- Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makersHealth Policy, 2002
- The Ethics Of Accountability In Managed Care ReformHealth Affairs, 1998