Impact of pericardium bovine patch (Tutomesh®) on incisional hernia treatment in contaminated or potentially contaminated fields: retrospective comparative study
- 1 March 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Hernia
- Vol. 19 (2), 259-266
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1228-6
Abstract
This retrospective comparative study analyzes the outcome of patients affected by incisional hernia in potentially contaminated or contaminated field, treated by three operative techniques. 152 patients (62 M:90 F; mean age 65 ± 14 years) underwent incisional hernia repair (January 2002–January 2012) in complicated settings. Criteria of inclusion in the study were represented by the following causes of admission: mesh rejection/infection, obstruction without gangrene but with possible peritoneal bacterial translocation, obstruction with gangrene, enterocutaneous fistula or simultaneous presence of ileo- or colostomy. The patients were divided into three groups: A (n = 76), treated with primary closure technique; B and C (n = 38 each), with reinforcement by synthetic or pericardium bovine mesh (Tutomesh®), respectively. The prosthetic groups were divided into Onlay and Sublay subgroups. Significant decreases in C vs A were observed for wound infection (3 vs 37 %) and recurrence (0 vs 14 %), and in C vs B for wound infection (3 vs 53 %), seroma (0 vs 34 %) and recurrence (0 vs 16 %). Patients with concomitant bowel resection (BR) (43 %) showed (all P < 0.05) an increase of overall morbidity (55 vs 33 %) and wound infection rate (42 vs 24 %) compared to cases without BR. Morbidity presented no significant differences in C-Onlay or Sublay subgroups. B-Sublay subgroup has (all P < 0.05) lower overall morbidity (20 vs 75 %), wound infection (10 vs 68 %) and seroma (0 vs 46 %) than B-Onlay. The pericardium bovine patch seems to be safe and effective to successfully repair ventral hernia in potentially contaminated operative fields, especially in association with bowel resection.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bovine versus Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix for Complex Abdominal Wall ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2013
- Use of bovine pericardium graft for abdominal wall reconstruction in contaminated fieldsWorld Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2012
- One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized studyHernia, 2010
- Repair of abdominal wall defects with bovine pericardiumThe American Journal of Surgery, 2009
- Use of porcine dermal collagen graft (Permacol) for hernia repair in contaminated fieldsHernia, 2006
- Acellular extracellular matrix for inguinal hernia repairHernia, 2006
- Retrofascial mesh repair of ventral incisional herniasThe American Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Suture Versus Mesh Repair of Incisional HerniaAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Surgical treatment of incisional herniaBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Modifications to Rives technique for midline incisional hernia repairHernia, 2001