Impact of a Proactive Approach to Improve End-of-Life Care in a Medical ICU
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Chest
- Vol. 123 (1), 266-271
- https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.1.266
Abstract
To assess the impact of a proactive case finding approach to end-of-life care for critically ill patients experiencing global cerebral ischemia (GCI) after cardiopulmonary resuscitation and multiple organ system failure (MOSF) in comparison to historical control subjects. Comparative study of retrospective and prospective cohorts. Medical ICU of a university hospital. Patterns of end-of life care for patients with MOSF and GCI obtained through a retrospective chart review were compared to proactive case finding facilitated by the inpatient palliative care service. Interventions included identification of patient's advance directives or preferences about end-of life care, if any; assistance with discussion of the prognosis and treatment options with patients or their surrogates; and implementation of palliative care strategies when treatment goals changed to a focus on comfort measures. Although our retrospective data demonstrated a high percentage of do-not-resuscitate decisions for the patients under investigation, a considerable time lag elapsed between identification of the poor prognosis and the establishment of end-of-life treatment goals (4.7 +/- 2.4 days and 3.5 +/- 0.5 days for patients with MOSF and GCI, respectively [mean +/- SE]). The proactive case finding approach decreased hospital length of stay (mean, 20.6 +/- 4.1 days vs 15.1 +/- 2.5 days and 8.6 +/- 1.6 days vs 4.7 +/- 0.6 days for MOSF and GCI patients, respectively; p = 0.063 and < 0.001, respectively). More importantly, a proactive palliative care intervention decreased the time between identification of the poor prognosis and the establishment of comfort care goals (7.3 +/- 2.9 days vs 2.2 +/- 0.8 days and 6.3 +/- 1.2 days vs 3.5 +/- 0.4 days for MOSF and GCI patients, respectively; p < 0.05 for both), decreased the time dying patients with MOSF remained in the ICU, and reduced the use of nonbeneficial resources, thus reducing the cost of care. Proactive interventions from a palliative care consultant within this subset of patients decreased the use of nonbeneficial resources and avoided protracted dying.This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Death in two Canadian intensive care units: Institutional difference and changes over timeCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- A National Survey of End-of-life Care for Critically Ill PatientsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1998
- Patient Preferences for Communication with Physicians about End-of-Life DecisionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1997
- Variations in the Use of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in ICUsChest, 1996
- A Controlled Trial to Improve Care for Seriously III Hospitalized PatientsJAMA, 1995
- Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: conflicts between physicians' practices and patients' wishes.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1995
- Short-Rerm Mortality Predictions for Critically Ill Hospitalized Adults: Science and EthicsScience, 1991
- Decisions about Resuscitation: Inequities among Patients with Different Diseases but Similar PrognosesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1989
- Impact of a Comprehensive Supportive Care Team on Management of Hopelessly III Patients with Multiple Organ FailureChest, 1989