Beyond Impression Management: Evaluating three measures of response distortion and their relationship to job performance
- 14 November 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Selection and Assessment
- Vol. 19 (4), 340-351
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00563.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- They Don't Do It Often, But They Do It Well: Exploring the relationship between applicant mental abilities and fakingInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2009
- Prediction of Mulitdimensional Criteria: Distinguishing Task and contextual PerformanceHuman Performance, 1998
- Effects of faking set on validity of the NEO-FFIPersonality and Individual Differences, 1997
- A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual PerformanceHuman Performance, 1997
- Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996
- Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996
- Response bias, social desirability and dissimulationPersonality and Individual Differences, 1986
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Inflation bias in self-assessment examinations: Implications for valid employee selection.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984
- PREDICTING TEST PERFORMANCE: A CONTENT VALID APPROACH TO SCREENING APPLICANTSPersonnel Psychology, 1984