Emotion Perception from Dynamic and Static Body Expressions in Point-Light and Full-Light Displays
- 25 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 33 (6), 717-746
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p5096
Abstract
Research on emotion recognition has been dominated by studies of photographs of facial expressions. A full understanding of emotion perception and its neural substrate will require investigations that employ dynamic displays and means of expression other than the face. Our aims were: (i) to develop a set of dynamic and static whole-body expressions of basic emotions for systematic investigations of clinical populations, and for use in functional-imaging studies; (ii) to assess forced-choice emotion-classification performance with these stimuli relative to the results of previous studies; and (iii) to test the hypotheses that more exaggerated whole-body movements would produce (a) more accurate emotion classification and (b) higher ratings of emotional intensity. Ten actors portrayed 5 emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, and sadness) at 3 levels of exaggeration, with their faces covered. Two identical sets of 150 emotion portrayals (full-light and point-light) were created from the same digital footage, along with corresponding static images of the ‘peak’ of each emotion portrayal. Recognition tasks confirmed previous findings that basic emotions are readily identifiable from body movements, even when static form information is minimised by use of point-light displays, and that full-light and even point-light displays can convey identifiable emotions, though rather less efficiently than dynamic displays. Recognition success differed for individual emotions, corroborating earlier results about the importance of distinguishing differences in movement characteristics for different emotional expressions. The patterns of misclassifications were in keeping with earlier findings on emotional clustering. Exaggeration of body movement (a) enhanced recognition accuracy, especially for the dynamic point-light displays, but notably not for sadness, and (b) produced higher emotional-intensity ratings, regardless of lighting condition, for movies but to a lesser extent for stills, indicating that intensity judgments of body gestures rely more on movement (or form-from-movement) than static form information.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dissociable neural systems for recognizing emotionsBrain and Cognition, 2003
- Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS regionTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000
- Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damageNeuropsychologia, 1999
- Enhancing images of facial expressionsPerception & Psychophysics, 1999
- Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdalaNature, 1994
- Movement, face processing and schizophrenia: Evidence of a differential deficit in expression analysisBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1994
- Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992
- Face processing in psychiatric conditionsBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1992
- Emotion recognition: The role of facial movement and the relative importance of upper and lower areas of the face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978