On the value of homogeneous constructs for construct validation, theory testing, and the description of psychopathology.
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Assessment
- Vol. 21 (3), 272-284
- https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016699
Abstract
The authors argue for a significant shift in how clinical psychology researchers conduct construct validation and theory validation tests. They argue that sound theory and validation tests can best be conducted on measures of unidimensional or homogeneous constructs. Hierarchical organizations of such constructs are useful descriptively and theoretically, but higher order composites do not refer to definable psychological processes. Application of this perspective to the approach of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders to describing psychopathology calls into doubt the traditional use of the syndromal approach, in which single scores reflect the presence of multidimensional disorders. For many forms of psychological dysfunction, this approach does not appear optimal and may need to be discarded. The authors note that their perspective represents a straightforward application of existing psychometric theory, they demonstrate the practical value of adopting this perspective, and they provide evidence that this shift is already under way among clinical researchers. Description in terms of homogeneous dimensions provides improved validity, utility, and parsimony. In contrast, the use of composite diagnoses can retard scientific progress and hamper clinicians' efforts to understand and treat dysfunction.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA 016166, R21 AA015218)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 007304)
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical utility and DSM-V.Psychological Assessment, 2009
- Clinical lumping and molecular splitting of LEOPARD and NF1/NF1‐Noonan syndromesAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2007
- Delineating the Structure of Normal and Abnormal Personality: An Integrative Hierarchical Approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005
- The structure of obsessionality among young adultsDepression and Anxiety, 2004
- Heritability of individual depressive symptomsJournal of Affective Disorders, 2004
- Latent variables in psychology and the social sciencesAnnual Review of Psychology, 2001
- Toward DSM—V and the classification of psychopathology.Psychological Bulletin, 2000
- Symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorderAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1997
- Higher-order factors of the Big Five.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997
- Domains and Facets: Hierarchical Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality InventoryJournal of Personality Assessment, 1995