Australasian randomised trial to evaluate the role of maternal intramuscular dexamethasone versus betamethasone prior to preterm birth to increase survival free of childhood neurosensory disability (A*STEROID): study protocol
Open Access
- 3 May 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 13 (1), 1-7
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-104
Abstract
Background Both dexamethasone and betamethasone, given to women at risk of preterm birth, substantially improve short-term neonatal health, increase the chance of the baby being discharged home alive, and reduce childhood neurosensory disability, remaining safe into adulthood. However, it is unclear which corticosteroid is of greater benefit to mother and child. This study aims to determine whether giving dexamethasone to women at risk of preterm birth at less than 34 weeks’ gestation increases the chance of their children surviving free of neurosensory disability at two years’ corrected age, compared with betamethasone. Methods/Design Design randomised, multicentre, placebo controlled trial. Inclusion criteria women at risk of preterm birth at less than 34 weeks’ gestation with a singleton or twin pregnancy and no contraindications to the use of antenatal corticosteroids and who give informed consent. Trial entry & randomisation at telephone randomisation eligible women will be randomly allocated to either the dexamethasone group or the betamethasone group, allocated a study number and corresponding treatment pack. Study groups women in the dexamethasone group will be administered two syringes of 12 mg dexamethasone (dexamethasone sodium phosphate) and women in the betamethasone group will be administered two syringes of 11.4 mg betamethasone (Celestone Chronodose). Both study groups consist of intramuscular treatments 24 hours apart. Primary study outcome death or any neurosensory disability measured in children at two years’ corrected age. Sample size a sample size of 1449 children is required to detect either a decrease in death or any neurosensory disability from 27.0% to 20.1% with dexamethasone compared with betamethasone, or an increase from 27.0% to 34.5% (two-sided alpha 0.05, 80% power, 5% loss to follow up, design effect 1.2). Discussion This study will provide high-level evidence of direct relevance for clinical practice. If one drug clearly results in significantly fewer deaths and fewer disabled children then it should be used consistently in women at risk of preterm birth and would be of great importance to women at risk of preterm birth, their children, health services and communities. Trial registration Trial registration number: ACTRN12608000631303This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Betamethasone vs dexamethasone for the prevention of morbidity in very-low-birthweight neonatesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- Outcomes at 2 Years of Age after Repeat Doses of Antenatal CorticosteroidsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Antenatal Betamethasone Compared With Dexamethasone (Betacode Trial)Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Short-Term Outcomes in Low Birth Weight Infants Following Antenatal Exposure to Betamethasone Versus DexamethasoneObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Choice and dose of corticosteroid for antenatal treatmentsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Antenatal Corticosteroid Therapy for Fetal MaturationInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2002
- Antenatal Glucocorticoid Treatment and Cystic Periventricular Leukomalacia in Very Premature InfantsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1995
- Blood pressure nomograms for children and adolescents, by height, sex, and age, in the United StatesThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1993
- Effects of antenatal dexamethasone administration in the infant: Long-term follow-upThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1984