Communication of Uncertainty Regarding Individualized Cancer Risk Estimates
- 29 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 31 (2), 354-366
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10371830
Abstract
Objective. To examine the effects of communicating uncertainty regarding individualized colorectal cancer risk estimates and to identify factors that influence these effects. Methods. Two Web-based experiments were conducted, in which adults aged 40 years and older were provided with hypothetical individualized colorectal cancer risk estimates differing in the extent and representation of expressed uncertainty. The uncertainty consisted of imprecision (otherwise known as “ambiguity”) of the risk estimates and was communicated using different representations of confidence intervals. Experiment 1 ( n = 240) tested the effects of ambiguity (confidence interval v. point estimate) and representational format (textual v. visual) on cancer risk perceptions and worry. Potential effect modifiers, including personality type (optimism), numeracy, and the information’s perceived credibility, were examined, along with the influence of communicating uncertainty on responses to comparative risk information. Experiment 2 ( n = 135) tested enhanced representations of ambiguity that incorporated supplemental textual and visual depictions. Results. Communicating uncertainty led to heightened cancer-related worry in participants, exemplifying the phenomenon of “ambiguity aversion.” This effect was moderated by representational format and dispositional optimism; textual (v. visual) format and low (v. high) optimism were associated with greater ambiguity aversion. However, when enhanced representations were used to communicate uncertainty, textual and visual formats showed similar effects. Both the communication of uncertainty and use of the visual format diminished the influence of comparative risk information on risk perceptions. Conclusions. The communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates has complex effects, which include heightening cancer-related worry—consistent with ambiguity aversion—and diminishing the influence of comparative risk information on risk perceptions. These responses are influenced by representational format and personality type, and the influence of format appears to be modifiable and content dependent.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laypersons' Responses to the Communication of Uncertainty Regarding Cancer Risk EstimatesMedical Decision Making, 2009
- Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction Tool for White Men and Women Without Known SusceptibilityJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.Psychological Bulletin, 2009
- “If I’m better than average, then I’m ok?”: Comparative information influences beliefs about risk and benefitsPatient Education and Counseling, 2007
- Design Features of Graphs in Health Risk Communication: A Systematic ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2006
- Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2003
- A Qualitative Evaluation of the Harvard Cancer Risk IndexJournal of Health Communication, 1999
- Communicating Uncertainty: Framing Effects on Responses to Vague ProbabilitiesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997
- The Relative Importance of Probabilities, Outcomes, and Vagueness in Hazard Risk DecisionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- The center and range of the probability interval as factors affecting ambiguity preferencesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985