Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 26 November 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 18 (1), 151
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7
Abstract
Participant retention strategies that minimise attrition in longitudinal cohort studies have evolved considerably in recent years. This study aimed to assess, via systematic review and meta-analysis, the effectiveness of both traditional strategies and contemporary innovations for retention adopted by longitudinal cohort studies in the past decade. Health research databases were searched for retention strategies used within longitudinal cohort studies published in the 10-years prior, with 143 eligible longitudinal cohort studies identified (141 articles; sample size range: 30 to 61,895). Details on retention strategies and rates, research designs, and participant demographics were extracted. Meta-analyses of retained proportions were performed to examine the association between cohort retention rate and individual and thematically grouped retention strategies. Results identified 95 retention strategies, broadly classed as either: barrier-reduction, community-building, follow-up/reminder, or tracing strategies. Forty-four of these strategies had not been identified in previous reviews. Meta-regressions indicated that studies using barrier-reduction strategies retained 10% more of their sample (95%CI [0.13 to 1.08]; p = .01); however, studies using follow-up/reminder strategies lost an additional 10% of their sample (95%CI [− 1.19 to − 0.21]; p = .02). The overall number of strategies employed was not associated with retention. Employing a larger number of retention strategies may not be associated with improved retention in longitudinal cohort studies, contrary to earlier narrative reviews. Results suggest that strategies that aim to reduce participant burden (e.g., flexibility in data collection methods) might be most effective in maximising cohort retention.Keywords
Funding Information
- Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University
- Australian Unity (Senior Research Fellowship)
- Australian Research Council (Principal Research Fellowship)
This publication has 163 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using a birth cohort to study ageing: representativeness and response rates in the National Survey of Health and DevelopmentEuropean Journal of Ageing, 2013
- Feasibility of a longitudinal study of women anticipating first pregnancy and assessed by multiple pelvic exams: Recruitment and retention challengesContemporary Clinical Trials, 2010
- Sierra Leone's Former Child Soldiers: A Longitudinal Study of Risk, Protective Factors, and Mental HealthJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2010
- Using Constructs of the Transtheoretical Model to Predict Classes of Change in Regular Physical Activity: A Multi-Ethnic Longitudinal Cohort StudyAnnals of Behavioral Medicine, 2010
- Factors influencing enrolment: A case study from Birth to Twenty, the 1990 birth cohort in Soweto–JohannesburgEvaluation and Program Planning, 2009
- Individual, physical and psychological risk factors for neck pain in Australian office workers: a 1-year longitudinal studyEuropean Spine Journal, 2009
- Problem-solving style and adaptation in breast cancer survivors: a prospective analysisJournal of Cancer Survivorship, 2009
- Extended recruitment efforts minimize attrition but not necessarily biasJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participantsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007
- Issues in Design and Implementation in an Urban Birth Cohort Study: The Syracuse AUDIT ProjectJournal of Urban Health, 2006