Flocked nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate for detection of respiratory tract viruses in immunocompromised adults: a matched comparative study
Open Access
- 26 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 10 (1), 340
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-340
Abstract
Several studies have compared nasal swabs to the more invasive nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) for detection of respiratory viruses. Mostly, the comparisons have been performed on immunocompetent children with upper respiratory tract symptoms. The results range from a relatively poor sensitivity for the swabs to an even higher sensitivity than for the NPA. We aimed to investigate the sensitivity of a flocked nasal swab (fNS) on immunocompromised adults with febrile neutropenia. During 16 months, adults with a hematological disorder presenting with febrile neutropenia were enrolled in the study. Paired samples of the fNS and NPA were collected in the outer part of the nasal cavity and the nasopharynx, respectively. The samples were analyzed regarding a panel of 15 respiratory viruses by means of quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Furthermore, as an indirect measure of cell yield by either method, the copy number of the human beta actin gene was also determined. Cohen's kappa was calculated as a measure of agreement of the results obtained from either method. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for comparison of cell yield. A total of 98 paired samples from a total of 89 patients were collected. Twenty of the pairs had virus detected in at least one of the specimens; 11 in both, 7 in NPA only, and 2 in fNS only. For the fNS, the overall sensitivity for any virus and for rhinovirus only was 65% and 78%, respectively. NPA was significantly superior to the fNS in collecting epithelial cells. We found the overall sensitivity of 65% to be too low to replace NPA with this sampling technique in this patient category.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Respiratory viruses, a common microbiological finding in neutropenic children with feverJournal of Clinical Virology, 2010
- Comparison of four nasal sampling methods for the detection of viral pathogens by RT-PCR—A GA2LEN projectJournal of Virological Methods, 2009
- Comparing Nose-Throat Swabs and Nasopharyngeal Aspirates Collected From Children With Symptoms for Respiratory Virus Identification Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionPublished by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ,2008
- Comparison of Respiratory Virus Detection Rates for Infants and Toddlers by Use of Flocked Swabs, Saline Aspirates, and Saline Aspirates Mixed in Universal Transport Medium for Room Temperature Storage and ShippingJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- Comparison between Pernasal Flocked Swabs and Nasopharyngeal Aspirates for Detection of Common Respiratory Viruses in Samples from ChildrenJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- Most human metapneumovirus and human respiratory syncytial virus in infant nasal secretions is cell freeJournal of Clinical Virology, 2007
- Comparison of Flocked and Rayon Swabs for Collection of Respiratory Epithelial Cells from Uninfected Volunteers and Symptomatic PatientsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- RSV testing in bronchiolitis: which nasal sampling method is best?Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2005
- Nasal Swab versus Nasopharyngeal Aspirate for Isolation of Respiratory VirusesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Rapid painless diagnosis of viral respiratory infectionArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2002