A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating interventions in adult literacy and numeracy
- 28 October 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Research in Reading
- Vol. 26 (3), 234-255
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00200
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computer‐assisted vs. teacher‐directed teaching of numeracy in adultsJournal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2000
- Effectiveness of Vocational Education and Employment Programs for Adult OffendersJournal of Offender Rehabilitation, 2000
- Efficacy of a Computer-Assisted Instruction Program in a Prison Setting: An Experimental StudyAdult Education Quarterly, 2000
- Does Mandatory Basic Education Improve Achievement Test Scores of Afdc Recipients?Evaluation Review, 1997
- The Use of Theory-Based Computer-Assisted Instruction in Correctional Centers to Enhance the Reading Skills of Reading-Disadvantaged AdultsJournal of Educational Computing Research, 1996
- Adult reading achievement comparing computer‐assisted and traditional approaches: A comprehensive review of the experimental literatureReading Research and Instruction, 1995
- Teaching text comprehension strategies to adult poor readersReading and Writing, 1993
- Using closed captioned television to teach reading to adultsReading Research and Instruction, 1989
- Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- The Effectiveness of Computer-Based Adult Education: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Educational Computing Research, 1986