Utility of Pooled Urine Specimens for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Men Attending Public Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinics in Mumbai, India, by PCR
Open Access
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 43 (4), 1674-1677
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.43.4.1674-1677.2005
Abstract
Pooling urogenital specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by nucleic acid amplification tests is an attractive alternative to individual testing. As pooling can reduce the costs of testing as well as labor, it has been advocated for use in resource-poor settings. However, it has neither been widely adopted nor evaluated for use in developing countries. We evaluated the practical use of pooling first-catch urine (FCU) specimens for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae from 690 men in Mumbai, India, by PCR. FCU, urethral smears, and swabs were collected from men seen at two sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. All laboratory testing was done at the Lokmanya Tilak General Hospital. Gram stain smears and culture isolation for N. gonorrhoeae were performed. Each FCU was tested individually and in pools using the Roche Amplicor PCR for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae with an internal control for inhibition. Specimen pools consisted of aliquots from five consecutively processed FCUs combined into an amplification tube. An optical density reading of ≥0.20 indicated a pool for which subsequent testing of individual samples was required. Prevalence by PCR on single specimens was 2.2% (15/690) for C. trachomatis and 5.4% (37/690) for N. gonorrhoeae . Compared to individual FCU results, pooling for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae had an overall sensitivity of 96.1% (50/52). Specificity was 96.5% (83/86) in that three pools required single testing that failed to identify a positive specimen. Pooling missed two positive specimens, decreased the inhibition rate, and saved 50.3% of reagent costs. In this resource-limited setting, the use of pooling to detect C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae by PCR proved to be a simple, accurate, and cost-effective procedure compared to individual testing.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laboratory Tests Used in U.S. Public Health Laboratories for Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2000Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2004
- The Effect of Urine Testing in Evaluations of the Sensitivity of the Gen-Probe APTIMA??Combo 2 Assay on Endocervical Swabs for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeaeSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2004
- Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection in apparently healthy adult population of Tamil Nadu, India: a population-based studyInternational Journal of STD & AIDS, 2004
- Predominance of Chlamydia trachomatis Serovars Associated with Urogenital Infections in Females in New Delhi, IndiaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Screening tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections--2002.2002
- Chlamydia trachomatis infection in an urban settingSexually Transmitted Infections, 2001
- Multicenter Evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Urine Specimens, Female Endocervical Swabs, and Male Urethral SwabsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001
- Pooling of Chlamydia laboratory tests to determine the prevalence of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infectionOphthalmic Epidemiology, 2001
- Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in individual and pooled endocervical and urethral scrapes by a commercially available polymerase chain reactionAPMIS, 1994
- Evaluation of syva's enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimensDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1992