Spinal Surgery Fellowship Education in Canada
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Spine
- Vol. 38 (1), 83-91
- https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3182640f69
Abstract
A cross-sectional survey of spine surgery fellowship educators and trainees. To determine educator and trainee perspectives on the relative importance of core cognitive and procedural competencies in fellowship training. To determine perceptions of confidence in competencies by trainees near the end of their fellowship. Finally, to determine potential differences comparing surgeons by background specialty training (neurosurgical or orthopedic) of their views on competencies. Spine surgery is a growing subspecialty with increasing collaboration among specialists of varied specialty backgrounds involved in education. With the recent implementation of competency-based curricula during specialty training, opportunities may exist in enhancing fellowship education. A questionnaire on cognitive and procedural competencies was administered (online and paper) to fellowship educators and trainees across Canada. A follow-up questionnaire was administered to nonresponders 3 months later. Survey results were summarized using qualitative and descriptive statistics with comparative analyses performed. Of the identified respondents, the response rate was 91%, (15/17 fellow trainees; 47/51 educators). Twelve of the 13 core cognitive skill categories were rated as being important to acquire by the end of fellowship. Trainees were not comfortable performing, and requested additional training in 8 of the 29 less common and technically demanding procedural skills. There were different perceptions on the relative importance of competencies comparing trainees by specialty background as well as different perceptions on the types of competencies where additional training was desired to achieve competency (P < 0.05). Fellowship educators and trainees possessed similar perceptions on the relative importance of core cognitive and procedural competencies required for successful training. Background specialty influenced the perceptions of both fellowship educators and trainees. This study identified potential gaps or perceived deficiencies in the competency of current fellows. Improvements in spine fellowship education should target these areas through developing evidence-based curriculum changes.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Faculty Development in Assessment: The Missing Link in Competency-Based Medical EducationAcademic Medicine, 2011
- Advancing Resident Assessment in Graduate Medical EducationJournal of Graduate Medical Education, 2009
- Spine surgery training and competence of European Neurosurgical TraineesActa Neurochirurgica, 2009
- Orthopaedic surgery core curriculum: the spineHeart, 2007
- Spine FellowshipsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2006
- Confidence in Spine Training Among Senior Neurosurgical and Orthopedic ResidentsSpine, 2006
- Towards a hybrid philosophy of surgical educationAnz Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Spine TrainingThe Spine Journal, 2001
- Resident and Fellowship GuidelinesSpine, 2000
- The Education, Training, and Evaluation of a Spine SurgeonSpine, 1996