Internal Quality Control for Cervical Cytopathology: Comparison of Potential False-Negatives Detected at Rapid Prescreening and at 100% Rapid Review
- 1 October 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Acta Cytologica
- Vol. 58 (5), 439-445
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000368041
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the performance of rapid prescreening (RPS) and 100% rapid review (RR-100%) as internal quality control (IQC) methods assessed by outcome at colposcopy, histopathology and repeat cytopathology for cases with false-negative results on cervical cytopathology at routine screening (RS). Study Design: Out of 12,208 cytology smears analyzed, 900 were abnormal. Of these, 656 were identified at RS, and 244 were false-negative, with 90.2% identified at RPS and 57.4% at RR-100%. Of the 900 abnormal cases, 436 were submitted for additional testing. Results: Of the 244 women with cytopathological abnormalities identified only by the IQC methods, 114 had supplementary examinations: 35 were submitted for colposcopy, 22 for biopsy and 99 for repeat cytopathology. The sensitivity of RPS for the detection of abnormalities identified on colposcopy, histopathology and repeat cytopathology was 87.5% (95% CI 67.6-97.3), 82.4% (95% CI 56.6-96.2) and 95.7% (95% CI 85.2-99.5), respectively. The sensitivity of RR-100% was 54.2% (95% CI 32.8-74.4), 52.9% (95% CI 27.8-77.0) and 47.8% (95% CI 32.9-63.1), respectively. RPS was more sensitive than RR-100% when compared to the findings on colposcopy (p = 0.011) and repeat cytopathology (p = 0.000). When compared to colposcopy, histopathology and repeat cytopathology, the sensitivity of RS was 83.2% (95% CI 76.1-88.9), 85.7% (95% CI 78.1-91.5) and 73.3% (95% CI 66.0-79.7), respectively. Conclusion: RPS performed better than RR-100% when compared to the results of colposcopy and repeat cytopathology.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improvement in the routine screening of cervical smearsCancer Cytopathology, 2011
- Rapid Pre-Screening Is More Sensitive in Liquid-Based Cytology than in Conventional SmearsActa Cytologica, 2010
- Usefulness of repeat cytology at the time of first colposcopyDiagnostic Cytopathology, 2008
- Assuring the quality of quality assuranceCancer, 2008
- Rapid review in cervical cytology: a retrospective review of cases detected on rapid review within a DGH cytology department and subsequent outcomeCytopathology, 2004
- Rapid pre-screening of Pap smears in quality control: an Italian experienceCytopathology, 2004
- Comparação entre a colpocitologia oncológica de encaminhamento e a da gravidade das lesões cervicais intra-epiteliaisRevista de Saúde Pública, 2000
- False Positive Cervicovaginal CytologyActa Cytologica, 1997
- Role of re-screening of cervical smears in internal quality control.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1995
- Cancer of the Cervix: Death by IncompetenceThe Lancet, 1985