Program Evaluation in Classrooms for Students with Autism
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities
- Vol. 15 (3), 170-175
- https://doi.org/10.1177/108835760001500308
Abstract
This article reviews goal attainment scaling as an alternative method for evaluating treatments and programs for children with autism. Traditional evaluation methods such as compliance monitoring and efficacy studies may be unable to account for the elaborate set of components mandated by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the number and variety of treatment/program options available to students with autism. Assessing the quality of program services delivered to children (i.e., process goals) and the progress of children in meeting those goals (i.e., outcome goals) should be the fundamental concern of programs for students with autism. The use of goal attainment scaling as an alternative evaluation method may provide a convergent link between student outcome goals and program goals within a framework of family-centered practices. A case study is provided to illustrate the use of goal attainment scaling.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interventions for Children and Youth with AutismFocus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 1998
- Stakeholder Information NeedsEvaluation Review, 1992
- Using Qualitative Evaluation Methods to Identify Exemplary Practices in Early Childhood EducationEarly Education and Development, 1992
- Contextual AppraisalRemedial and Special Education, 1988
- The Efficacy of Early Intervention Programs: A Meta-AnalysisExceptional Children, 1986
- Goal Attainment Scaling with Moderately and Severely Handicapped Preschool ChildrenJournal of the Division for Early Childhood, 1984
- Goal Attainment Scaling as a Useful Tool for Evaluating Progress in Special EducationExceptional Children, 1979
- Goal Attainment ScalingEvaluation Quarterly, 1979
- Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programsCommunity Mental Health Journal, 1968