Sabotage and subterfuge: public relations, democracy and genetic engineering in New Zealand
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Media, Culture & Society
- Vol. 24 (3), 325-343
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400303
Abstract
This article examines the public relations management of communication about genetic engineering in New Zealand. The theme is explored through an analysis of work developed by the consultancy Communication Trumps for, on the one hand, a private company involved in genetic research on fish, and, on the other hand, a government-supported public information campaign about genetic engineering. In relation to the issues management strategies employed by Communication Trumps, the article exemplifies how, by deploying tactics more commonly associated with propaganda and the engineering of consent, public relations can purposively attempt to undermine democratic processes. The article argues that through the attempted sabotage and silencing of the genetic engineering debate in New Zealand, the government, corporations, and the public relations industry combined in an effort to develop genetic engineering technologies while stifling public understanding of the implication of these technologies.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public relations, news production and changing patterns of source access in the British national mediaMedia, Culture & Society, 2000
- State propaganda and bureaucratic intelligence: The creation of public relations in 20th century BritainPublic Relations Review, 1999
- A discursive perspective from New Zealand: Another world viewPublic Relations Review, 1996
- The Aborted Debate Within Public Relations: An Approach Through Kuhn's ParadigmPublic Relations Research Annual, 1989
- Organizational Perspectives for Public Relations Research and PracticeManagement Communication Quarterly, 1987