Are Inventory Based and Remotely Sensed Above-Ground Biomass Estimates Consistent?
Open Access
- 19 September 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (9), e74170
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074170
Abstract
Carbon emissions resulting from deforestation and forest degradation are poorly known at local, national and global scales. In part, this lack of knowledge results from uncertain above-ground biomass estimates. It is generally assumed that using more sophisticated methods of estimating above-ground biomass, which make use of remote sensing, will improve accuracy. We examine this assumption by calculating, and then comparing, above-ground biomass area density (AGBD) estimates from studies with differing levels of methodological sophistication. We consider estimates based on information from nine different studies at the scale of Africa, Mozambique and a 1160 km2 study area within Mozambique. The true AGBD is not known for these scales and so accuracy cannot be determined. Instead we consider the overall precision of estimates by grouping different studies. Since an the accuracy of an estimate cannot exceed its precision, this approach provides an upper limit on the overall accuracy of the group. This reveals poor precision at all scales, even between studies that are based on conceptually similar approaches. Mean AGBD estimates for Africa vary from 19.9 to 44.3 Mg ha−1, for Mozambique from 12.7 to 68.3 Mg ha−1, and for the 1160 km2 study area estimates range from 35.6 to 102.4 Mg ha−1. The original uncertainty estimates for each study, when available, are generally small in comparison with the differences between mean biomass estimates of different studies. We find that increasing methodological sophistication does not appear to result in improved precision of AGBD estimates, and moreover, inadequate estimates of uncertainty obscure any improvements in accuracy. Therefore, despite the clear advantages of remote sensing, there is a need to improve remotely sensed AGBD estimates if they are to provide accurate information on above-ground biomass. In particular, more robust and comprehensive uncertainty estimates are needed.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dependence of hydropower energy generation on forests in the Amazon Basin at local and regional scalesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013
- Options for monitoring and estimating historical carbon emissions from forest degradation in the context of REDD+Carbon Balance and Management, 2011
- Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continentsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Assimilating canopy reflectance data into an ecosystem model with an Ensemble Kalman FilterRemote Sensing of Environment, 2008
- Difficulties in tracking the long-term global trend in tropical forest areaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Improved estimates of net carbon emissions from land cover change in the tropics for the 1990sGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 2004
- Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimatesPhilosophical Transactions B, 2004
- Landscape-scale variation in forest structure and biomass in a tropical rain forestForest Ecology and Management, 2000
- Constraints on modelling the deforestation and degradation of tropical open woodlandsGlobal Ecology and Biogeography, 1999
- Uncertainty in the biomass of Amazonian forests: An example from Rondônia, BrazilForest Ecology and Management, 1995