Is ambulatory monitoring for “community-acquired” syncope economically attractive? A cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized trial of external loop recorders versus Holter monitoring
- 30 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 150 (5), 1065.e1-1065.e5
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.08.003
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic Yield of External Electrocardiographic Loop Recorders in Patients with Recurrent Syncope and Negative Tilt Table TestPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2003
- A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncopeThe American Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Diagnostic Yield and Optimal Duration of Continuous-Loop Event Monitoring for the Diagnosis of Palpitations: A Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- CLINICAL GUIDELINE: Diagnosing Syncope: Part 2: Unexplained SyncopeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- CLINICAL GUIDELINE: Diagnosing Syncope: Part 1: Value of History, Physical Examination, and ElectrocardiographyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Utility of Patient-Activated Cardiac Event Recorders in General Clinical PracticeThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1997
- Evaluation and Management of the Patient With SyncopeJAMA, 1992
- The Duration of Holter Monitoring in Patients With SyncopeArchives of Internal Medicine, 1990
- Diagnostic efficacy of 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring for syncopeThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Importance of holter monitoring in patients with periodic cerebral symptomsAnnals of Neurology, 1977