Research Methods for Obtaining Primary Evidence
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 5 (4), 503-519
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300008436
Abstract
The use of new therapeutic and diagnostic technologies has become commonplace in modern medical practice. To avoid both clinical disappointment and the waste of money, health, and lives, the introduction of these technologies will have to be based on evidence that these technologies will do more good than harm. The evidence supporting their use should be derived using research methods designed to deal with placebo effects, confounders, and biases. Some of these methods, and the rationale for their use, are discussed in this article. Although the value of evidence derived from randomized controlled trials is stressed, the importance of reviewing critically the methodological details of such trials and interpreting their results with caution is emphasized. The benefits and risks of relying on case-control and cohort studies are reviewed.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- The role of before-after studies of therapeutic impact in the evaluation of diagnostic technologiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- Failure of Extracranial–Intracranial Arterial Bypass to Reduce the Risk of Ischemic StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- A methodological framework for assessing health indicesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1985
- Influence of Adherence to Treatment and Response of Cholesterol on Mortality in the Coronary Drug ProjectNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Controversy in Counting and Attributing Events in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Bias in analytic researchJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1979
- Alternative Analytic Methods for Case-Control Studies of Estrogens and Endometrial CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Combined Use of Leg Scanning and Impedance Plethysmography in Suspected Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977