Opting out and opting in: understanding the complexities of women's career transitions
- 15 May 2007
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Career Development International
- Vol. 12 (3), 218-237
- https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430710745872
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to explore the reasons why women are leaving the workplace. Are they opting out of the workforce to stay at home with their children as current media reports suggest, or are the reasons more complex as the Kaleidoscope Career Model (KCM) suggests? A second objective is to examine whether or not women's primary career motives change over time as predicted by the KCM. Lastly, the potential barriers or boundaries faced by women pursuing boundaryless careers will be identified. Design/methodology/approach – A survey was sent to 2,000 randomly selected women graduates of an international business school located in the USA. The response rate was 25 percent, or 497 women. Findings – The results revealed that 47 percent of the women surveyed had stopped working at some point in their career. Numerous reasons were cited for leaving. Only 35 percent of the women who stopped working cited rearing children as their sole reason for opting out. Sixty-two percent of the women reported that their career focus had changed. In line with the KCM predictions, mid-career women were most interested in finding balance in their lives and the desire for authenticity increased across the lifespan. Finally, 70 percent of the women who left eventually returned to work, debunking the myth that women opt out and do not return to the workforce. Our findings show that there are barriers that make it difficult to move across organizations, especially if time is taken off between jobs. Research limitations/implications – All of the respondents in this study have a graduate degree in international business; thus, the results may have limited generalizability to other populations. Nonetheless, this study provides valuable data that helps us to better understand the complexities of women's career paths. Originality/value – This study makes contributions to two different areas of career theory. First, it provides one of the first empirical tests of the KCM. In addition to showing that women are leaving companies for more complex reasons than for family reasons alone, it also shows that women's primary career motives shift over time in the manner predicted by the KCM. Second, the study contributes to the literature on boundaryless careers by showing that there are in fact barriers or boundaries faced by women attempting to pursue careers across organizations.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constructing a professional identity: how young female managers use role modelsWomen in Management Review, 2006
- The ‘bounded' career: An empirical study of human capital, career mobility and employment outcomes in a mediated labour marketHuman Relations, 2005
- The Long-Term Negative Impacts of Managerial Career InterruptionsGroup & Organization Management, 2005
- Senior women managers’ transition to entrepreneurshipCareer Development International, 2005
- Kaleidoscope careers: An alternate explanation for the “opt-out“ revolutionAcademy of Management Perspectives, 2005
- Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferencesJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2002
- Sex role stereotyping and requisites of successful top managersWomen in Management Review, 2002
- The Boundaryless Career Experiences of Mobile Spouses in Dual-Earner MarriagesGroup & Organization Management, 2001
- Cross-Currents in the River of Time: Conceptualizing the Complexities of Women's CareersJournal of Management, 1992
- Management Women and the New Facts of LifeWomen in Management Review, 1989