Importance of carbon dioxide physiological forcing to future climate change
- 5 May 2010
- journal article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 107 (21), 9513-9518
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913000107
Abstract
An increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentration influences climate both directly through its radiative effect (i.e., trapping longwave radiation) and indirectly through its physiological effect (i.e., reducing transpiration of land plants). Here we compare the climate response to radiative and physiological effects of increased CO(2) using the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) coupled Community Land and Community Atmosphere Model. In response to a doubling of CO(2), the radiative effect of CO(2) causes mean surface air temperature over land to increase by 2.86 +/- 0.02 K (+/- 1 standard error), whereas the physiological effects of CO(2) on land plants alone causes air temperature over land to increase by 0.42 +/- 0.02 K. Combined, these two effects cause a land surface warming of 3.33 +/- 0.03 K. The radiative effect of doubling CO(2) increases global runoff by 5.2 +/- 0.6%, primarily by increasing precipitation over the continents. The physiological effect increases runoff by 8.4 +/- 0.6%, primarily by diminishing evapotranspiration from the continents. Combined, these two effects cause a 14.9 +/- 0.7% increase in runoff. Relative humidity remains roughly constant in response to CO(2)-radiative forcing, whereas relative humidity over land decreases in response to CO(2)-physiological forcing as a result of reduced plant transpiration. Our study points to an emerging consensus that the physiological effects of increasing atmospheric CO(2) on land plants will increase global warming beyond that caused by the radiative effects of CO(2).Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Climate response to physiological forcing of carbon dioxide simulated by the coupled Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3.1) and Community Land Model (CLM3.0)Geophysical Research Letters, 2009
- Carbon dioxide induced stomatal closure increases radiative forcing via a rapid reduction in low cloudGeophysical Research Letters, 2009
- Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxideNature, 2007
- Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global WarmingJournal of Climate, 2006
- Food for Thought: Lower-Than-Expected Crop Yield Stimulation with Rising CO 2 ConcentrationsScience, 2006
- Biogeophysical effects of CO2 fertilization on global climateTellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 2006
- Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycleNature, 2002
- Evapotranspiration and soil water content in a scrub‐oak woodland under carbon dioxide enrichmentGlobal Change Biology, 2002
- Stomatal responses to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scalePlant, Cell & Environment, 1995
- Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layerAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1991