Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: the male warrior hypothesis
- 5 March 2012
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions B
- Vol. 367 (1589), 670-679
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0301
Abstract
The social science literature contains numerous examples of human tribalism and parochialism—the tendency to categorize individuals on the basis of their group membership, and treat ingroup members benevolently and outgroup members malevolently. We hypothesize that this tribal inclination is an adaptive response to the threat of coalitional aggression and intergroup conflict perpetrated by ‘warrior males’ in both ancestral and modern human environments. Here, we describe how male coalitional aggression could have affected the social psychologies of men and women differently and present preliminary evidence from experimental social psychological studies testing various predictions from the ‘male warrior’ hypothesis. Finally, we discuss the theoretical implications of our research for studying intergroup relations both in humans and non-humans and discuss some practical implications.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: An examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors.Psychological Bulletin, 2011
- Fertility and Intergroup Bias in Racial and Minimal-Group ContextsPsychological Science, 2011
- Formidability and the logic of human angerProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Fear Extinction to an Out-Group FacePsychological Science, 2009
- Overconfidence in wargames: experimental evidence on expectations, aggression, gender and testosteroneProceedings. Biological sciences, 2006
- The Role of Social Groups in the Persistence of Learned FearScience, 2005
- Fear of the Dark: Interactive Effects of Beliefs about Danger and Ambient Darkness on Ethnic StereotypesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003
- Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight.Psychological Review, 2000
- Are there "his" and "hers" types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999
- Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature.Psychological Bulletin, 1986