Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions
Top Cited Papers
- 31 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture
- Vol. 6 (2), 215-242
- https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2010.011
Abstract
Whilst computer-mediated communication (CMC) can benefit users by providing quick and easy communication between those separated by time and space, it can also provide varying degrees of anonymity that may encourage a sense of impunity and freedom from being held accountable for inappropriate online behaviour. As such, CMC is a fertile ground for studying impoliteness, whether it occurs in response to perceived threat (flaming), or as an end in its own right (trolling). Currently, first and second-order definitions of terms such as imlpoliteness (Brown and Levinson 1987; Bousfield 2008; Culpeper 2008; Terkourafi 2008), in-civility (Lakoff 2005), rudeness (Beebe 1995, Kienpointner 1997, 2008), and etiquette (Coulmas 1992), are subject to much discussion and debate, yet the CMC phenomenon of trolling is not adequately captured by any of these terms. Following Bousfield (in press), Culpeper (2010) and others, this paper suggests that a definition of trolling should be informed first and foremost by user discussions. Taking examples from a 172-million-word, asynchronous CMC corpus, four interrelated conditions of aggression, deception, disruption, and success are discussed. Finally, a working definition of trolling is presented.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impoliteness and emotional argumentsJournal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 2008
- Intention in pragmaticsIntercultural Pragmatics, 2008
- Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated communityJournal of Pragmatics, 2007
- Moral panic and alternative identity construction in UsenetJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2006
- Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest LinkJournal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 2005
- The Rhetorical Dynamics of Gender Harassment On-LineThe Information Society, 1999
- The limits of politeness: therapeutic and courtroom discoursemult, 1989
- Aggression ritualsCommunication Monographs, 1986
- Group processes in computer-mediated communicationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986
- Activity types and languageLinguistics, 1979