Obstetric “Conveniences”
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing
- Vol. 19 (2), 134-144
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005237-200504000-00010
Abstract
Common obstetric interventions are often for "convenience" rather than for clinical indications. Before proceeding, it should be clear who is the beneficiary of the convenience. The primary healthcare provider must make sure that women and their partners have a full understanding of what is known about the associated risks, benefits, and alternative approaches of the proposed intervention. Thorough and accurate information allows women to choose what is best for them and their infant on the basis of the individual clinical situation. Ideally, this discussion takes place during the prenatal period when there is ample opportunity to ask questions, reflect on the potential implications, and confer with partners and family members. A review of common obstetric interventions is provided. While these interventions often are medically indicated for the well-being of mothers and infants, the evidence supporting their benefits when used electively is controversial.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Induction of labor with oxytocin increases cesarean section rate as compared with oxytocin for augmentation of spontaneous labor in nulliparous parturients controlled for lumbar epidural analgesiaJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2004
- Trends and Issues in Labor Induction in the United States: Implications for Clinical PracticeJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 2003
- Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery ratesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- Common Areas of Litigation Related to Care During Labor and BirthThe Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 2003
- Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: A matched cohort studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- Excessive uterine activity accompanying induced laborObstetrics & Gynecology, 2001
- Physicians Who Induce Labor for Fetal Macrosomia Do Not Reduce Cesarean Delivery RatesJournal of Perinatology, 2001
- Labor inductionCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indicationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000
- Forty weeks and beyond: pregnancy outcomes by week of gestationObstetrics & Gynecology, 2000